13 subscribers
با برنامه Player FM !
"«Boundaries», Part 1: a key missing concept from utility theory" by Andrew Critch
Manage episode 335692202 series 3364760
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8oMF8Lv5jiGaQSFvo/boundaries-part-1-a-key-missing-concept-from-utility-theory
This is Part 1 of my «Boundaries» Sequence on LessWrong.
Summary: «Boundaries» are a missing concept from the axioms of game theory and bargaining theory, which might help pin-down certain features of multi-agent rationality (this post), and have broader implications for effective altruism discourse and x-risk (future posts).
1. Boundaries (of living systems)
Epistemic status: me describing what I mean.
With the exception of some relatively recent and isolated pockets of research on embedded agency (e.g., Orseau & Ring, 2012; Garrabrant & Demsky, 2018), most attempts at formal descriptions of living rational agents — especially utility-theoretic descriptions — are missing the idea that living systems require and maintain boundaries.
When I say boundary, I don't just mean an arbitrary constraint or social norm. I mean something that could also be called a membrane in a generalized sense, i.e., a layer of stuff-of-some-kind that physically or cognitively separates a living system from its environment, that 'carves reality at the joints' in a way that isn't an entirely subjective judgement of the living system itself. Here are some examples that I hope will convey my meaning:
فصل ها
1. "«Boundaries», Part 1: a key missing concept from utility theory" by Andrew Critch (00:00:00)
2. 1. Boundaries (of living systems) (00:00:45)
3. Figure 1: Cell membranes, skin, fences, group divisions, and state borders as living system boundaries. (00:02:07)
4. Text Resumes (00:02:53)
5. 2. Canonical disagreement points as missing from utility theory and game theory (00:05:34)
6. Figure 2: Folk Theorem (00:06:39)
7. Figure 3: Nash bargaining solution (00:08:38)
8. Figure 4: Kalai-Smordinsky bargaining solution (00:09:30)
9. Text Resumes (00:10:13)
10. Figure 5: Illustration of BATNAs delimiting a zone of potential agreement. (00:11:02)
11. Text Resumes (00:12:07)
12. Image: Mathematical formula (00:12:39)
13. Figure 6: People disagreeing and going home. (source: owned) (00:14:10)
14. 3. Boundaries as informing zero-point selection during bargaining (00:14:42)
15. 4. Some really important boundaries (00:15:56)
16. Figure 7: The Eastern Front in WWII. (00:16:24)
17. Text Resumes (00:16:53)
18. 5. Summary (00:17:40)
538 قسمت
Manage episode 335692202 series 3364760
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8oMF8Lv5jiGaQSFvo/boundaries-part-1-a-key-missing-concept-from-utility-theory
This is Part 1 of my «Boundaries» Sequence on LessWrong.
Summary: «Boundaries» are a missing concept from the axioms of game theory and bargaining theory, which might help pin-down certain features of multi-agent rationality (this post), and have broader implications for effective altruism discourse and x-risk (future posts).
1. Boundaries (of living systems)
Epistemic status: me describing what I mean.
With the exception of some relatively recent and isolated pockets of research on embedded agency (e.g., Orseau & Ring, 2012; Garrabrant & Demsky, 2018), most attempts at formal descriptions of living rational agents — especially utility-theoretic descriptions — are missing the idea that living systems require and maintain boundaries.
When I say boundary, I don't just mean an arbitrary constraint or social norm. I mean something that could also be called a membrane in a generalized sense, i.e., a layer of stuff-of-some-kind that physically or cognitively separates a living system from its environment, that 'carves reality at the joints' in a way that isn't an entirely subjective judgement of the living system itself. Here are some examples that I hope will convey my meaning:
فصل ها
1. "«Boundaries», Part 1: a key missing concept from utility theory" by Andrew Critch (00:00:00)
2. 1. Boundaries (of living systems) (00:00:45)
3. Figure 1: Cell membranes, skin, fences, group divisions, and state borders as living system boundaries. (00:02:07)
4. Text Resumes (00:02:53)
5. 2. Canonical disagreement points as missing from utility theory and game theory (00:05:34)
6. Figure 2: Folk Theorem (00:06:39)
7. Figure 3: Nash bargaining solution (00:08:38)
8. Figure 4: Kalai-Smordinsky bargaining solution (00:09:30)
9. Text Resumes (00:10:13)
10. Figure 5: Illustration of BATNAs delimiting a zone of potential agreement. (00:11:02)
11. Text Resumes (00:12:07)
12. Image: Mathematical formula (00:12:39)
13. Figure 6: People disagreeing and going home. (source: owned) (00:14:10)
14. 3. Boundaries as informing zero-point selection during bargaining (00:14:42)
15. 4. Some really important boundaries (00:15:56)
16. Figure 7: The Eastern Front in WWII. (00:16:24)
17. Text Resumes (00:16:53)
18. 5. Summary (00:17:40)
538 قسمت
همه قسمت ها
×




1 “Distillation Robustifies Unlearning” by Bruce W. Lee, Addie Foote, alexinf, leni, Jacob G-W, Harish Kamath, Bryce Woodworth, cloud, TurnTrout 17:19



1 “Beware General Claims about ‘Generalizable Reasoning Capabilities’ (of Modern AI Systems)” by LawrenceC 34:11

به Player FM خوش آمدید!
Player FM در سراسر وب را برای یافتن پادکست های با کیفیت اسکن می کند تا همین الان لذت ببرید. این بهترین برنامه ی پادکست است که در اندروید، آیفون و وب کار می کند. ثبت نام کنید تا اشتراک های شما در بین دستگاه های مختلف همگام سازی شود.