Artwork

محتوای ارائه شده توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal
Player FM - برنامه پادکست
با برنامه Player FM !

Ep 093: Waffle Cakes

14:22
 
اشتراک گذاری
 

Manage episode 380417989 series 2463849
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

Each week, we discuss a different topic about Clojure and functional programming.

If you have a question or topic you'd like us to discuss, tweet @clojuredesign, send an email to [email protected], or join the #clojuredesign-podcast channel on the Clojurians Slack.

This week, the topic is: "effective composition." We search for that sweet spot between full-featured mixes and simple ingredients when crafting your software recipes.

Our discussion includes:

  • What makes code "composable"? What makes it "not composable"?
  • What baking has in common with software design.
  • What baking does not have in common with software design.
  • Are you using ingredients or a box mix?
  • How to know when you need to split something apart.
  • When is a part too big? When is a part too small?
  • What is too flexible?
  • The principle of orthogonality.
  • Decomposing without the smell.

Selected quotes:

  • "This is a Clojure podcast. We have to have a definition every once in a while."
  • "When you try to take code that someone has made and combine it with other things, how much resistance, how much difficulty, do you begin to encounter?"
  • "A cake is a composition of smaller things."
  • "You're still composing a cake. You're just composing it out of bigger things."
  • "Let's compose dinner together."
  • "You might be fighting against some of the ingredients, because you have a whole lot of stuff that's been premixed that comes along for the ride."
  • "What if you want waffles?"
  • "Everything is made of atoms! If I could assemble atoms, I have ultimate flexibility!"
  • "If it's narrowly focused, it's hard for it to get in the way of other things."
  • "You're making well-suited things, that have small scopes of responsibility, so that you can weave them together appropriately for your domain."
  • "Who owns the recipe?"
  • "Ah yes, you are the cause and the solution of the problem!"
  • "Are you able to write a new recipe and reuse all the ingredients?"

Links:

  continue reading

118 قسمت

Artwork

Ep 093: Waffle Cakes

Functional Design in Clojure

72 subscribers

published

iconاشتراک گذاری
 
Manage episode 380417989 series 2463849
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

Each week, we discuss a different topic about Clojure and functional programming.

If you have a question or topic you'd like us to discuss, tweet @clojuredesign, send an email to [email protected], or join the #clojuredesign-podcast channel on the Clojurians Slack.

This week, the topic is: "effective composition." We search for that sweet spot between full-featured mixes and simple ingredients when crafting your software recipes.

Our discussion includes:

  • What makes code "composable"? What makes it "not composable"?
  • What baking has in common with software design.
  • What baking does not have in common with software design.
  • Are you using ingredients or a box mix?
  • How to know when you need to split something apart.
  • When is a part too big? When is a part too small?
  • What is too flexible?
  • The principle of orthogonality.
  • Decomposing without the smell.

Selected quotes:

  • "This is a Clojure podcast. We have to have a definition every once in a while."
  • "When you try to take code that someone has made and combine it with other things, how much resistance, how much difficulty, do you begin to encounter?"
  • "A cake is a composition of smaller things."
  • "You're still composing a cake. You're just composing it out of bigger things."
  • "Let's compose dinner together."
  • "You might be fighting against some of the ingredients, because you have a whole lot of stuff that's been premixed that comes along for the ride."
  • "What if you want waffles?"
  • "Everything is made of atoms! If I could assemble atoms, I have ultimate flexibility!"
  • "If it's narrowly focused, it's hard for it to get in the way of other things."
  • "You're making well-suited things, that have small scopes of responsibility, so that you can weave them together appropriately for your domain."
  • "Who owns the recipe?"
  • "Ah yes, you are the cause and the solution of the problem!"
  • "Are you able to write a new recipe and reuse all the ingredients?"

Links:

  continue reading

118 قسمت

همه قسمت ها

×
 
Loading …

به Player FM خوش آمدید!

Player FM در سراسر وب را برای یافتن پادکست های با کیفیت اسکن می کند تا همین الان لذت ببرید. این بهترین برنامه ی پادکست است که در اندروید، آیفون و وب کار می کند. ثبت نام کنید تا اشتراک های شما در بین دستگاه های مختلف همگام سازی شود.

 

راهنمای مرجع سریع

در حین کاوش به این نمایش گوش دهید
پخش