Artwork

محتوای ارائه شده توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal
Player FM - برنامه پادکست
با برنامه Player FM !

Ep 039: Why Use Clojure Over Another Functional Language?

25:17
 
اشتراک گذاری
 

Manage episode 238737256 series 2463849
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

Each week, we answer a different question about Clojure and functional programming.

If you have a question you'd like us to discuss, tweet @clojuredesign, send an email to [email protected], or join the #clojuredesign-podcast channel on the Clojurians Slack.

This week, the question is: "Why use Clojure over another functional language?". We examine the different categories of functional programming languages and distill out what differentiates Clojure and why we prefer it.

Selected quotes:

  • "Running just one function when developing is not only allowed in Clojure, it's encouraged and celebrated."
  • "You don't have to make the whole world (application) agree. You can work on just a part of it and then bring it back into the rest of the world when you want it to agree."
  • "I would like some XML in my cake."
  • "Oh, you were a hipster Scala user."
  • "When I pull in code off clojars, it's going to use the Clojure way, because there is a Clojure way."
  • "If you can make all your abstractions with a simpler set of semantics, wouldn't that be better than a broader set?"
  • "Multi-paradigm languages are inherently more complex. You really end up in the 'good parts' kind of problem. Scala, The Good Parts. Javascript, The Good Parts."
  • "Code is about communicating with two things. The computer and the other developers. The computer can handle esoteric language features, but other developers will have a harder time with them."

Related episodes:

  continue reading

118 قسمت

Artwork
iconاشتراک گذاری
 
Manage episode 238737256 series 2463849
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Christoph Neumann and Nate Jones, Christoph Neumann, and Nate Jones یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

Each week, we answer a different question about Clojure and functional programming.

If you have a question you'd like us to discuss, tweet @clojuredesign, send an email to [email protected], or join the #clojuredesign-podcast channel on the Clojurians Slack.

This week, the question is: "Why use Clojure over another functional language?". We examine the different categories of functional programming languages and distill out what differentiates Clojure and why we prefer it.

Selected quotes:

  • "Running just one function when developing is not only allowed in Clojure, it's encouraged and celebrated."
  • "You don't have to make the whole world (application) agree. You can work on just a part of it and then bring it back into the rest of the world when you want it to agree."
  • "I would like some XML in my cake."
  • "Oh, you were a hipster Scala user."
  • "When I pull in code off clojars, it's going to use the Clojure way, because there is a Clojure way."
  • "If you can make all your abstractions with a simpler set of semantics, wouldn't that be better than a broader set?"
  • "Multi-paradigm languages are inherently more complex. You really end up in the 'good parts' kind of problem. Scala, The Good Parts. Javascript, The Good Parts."
  • "Code is about communicating with two things. The computer and the other developers. The computer can handle esoteric language features, but other developers will have a harder time with them."

Related episodes:

  continue reading

118 قسمت

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

به Player FM خوش آمدید!

Player FM در سراسر وب را برای یافتن پادکست های با کیفیت اسکن می کند تا همین الان لذت ببرید. این بهترین برنامه ی پادکست است که در اندروید، آیفون و وب کار می کند. ثبت نام کنید تا اشتراک های شما در بین دستگاه های مختلف همگام سازی شود.

 

راهنمای مرجع سریع

در حین کاوش به این نمایش گوش دهید
پخش