Artwork

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

48 subscribers

Checked 5h ago
اضافه شده در four سال پیش
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Anton Chuvakin. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Anton Chuvakin یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal
Player FM - برنامه پادکست
با برنامه Player FM !
icon Daily Deals

EP198 GenAI Security: Unseen Attack Surfaces & AI Pentesting Lessons

27:22
 
اشتراک گذاری
 

Manage episode 449600593 series 2892548
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Anton Chuvakin. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Anton Chuvakin یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

Guests:

Topics:

  • What are some of the unique challenges in securing GenAI applications compared to traditional apps?
  • What current attack surfaces are most concerning for GenAI apps, and how do you see these evolving in the future?
  • Do you have your very own list of top 5 GenAI threats? Everybody seem to!
  • What are the most common security mistakes you see clients make with GenAI?
  • Can you explain the main goals when trying to add automation to pentesting for next-gen GenAI apps?
  • What are your AI testing lessons from clients so far?

Resources:

  continue reading

229 قسمت

Artwork
iconاشتراک گذاری
 
Manage episode 449600593 series 2892548
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Anton Chuvakin. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Anton Chuvakin یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

Guests:

Topics:

  • What are some of the unique challenges in securing GenAI applications compared to traditional apps?
  • What current attack surfaces are most concerning for GenAI apps, and how do you see these evolving in the future?
  • Do you have your very own list of top 5 GenAI threats? Everybody seem to!
  • What are the most common security mistakes you see clients make with GenAI?
  • Can you explain the main goals when trying to add automation to pentesting for next-gen GenAI apps?
  • What are your AI testing lessons from clients so far?

Resources:

  continue reading

229 قسمت

همه قسمت ها

×
 
Guest Alan Braithwaite , Co-founder and CTO @ RunReveal Topics: SIEM is hard, and many vendors have discovered this over the years. You need to get storage, security and integration complexity just right. You also need to be better than incumbents. How would you approach this now? Decoupled SIEM vs SIEM/EDR/XDR combo. These point in the opposite directions, which side do you think will win? In a world where data volumes are exploding, especially in cloud environments, you're building a SIEM with ClickHouse as its backend, focusing on both parsed and raw logs. What's the core advantage of this approach, and how does it address the limitations of traditional SIEMs in handling scale? Cribl, Bindplane and “security pipeline vendors” are all the rage. Won’t it be logical to just include this into a modern SIEM? You're envisioning a 'Pipeline QL' that compiles to SQL , enabling 'detection in SQL.' This sounds like a significant shift, and perhaps not to the better? (Anton is horrified, for once) How does this approach affect detection engineering? With Sigma HQ support out-of-the-box, and the ability to convert SPL to Sigma, you're clearly aiming for interoperability. How crucial is this approach in your vision, and how do you see it benefiting the security community? What is SIEM in 2025 and beyond? What’s the endgame for security telemetry data? Is this truly SIEM 3.0, 4.0 or whatever-oh? Resources: EP197 SIEM (Decoupled or Not), and Security Data Lakes: A Google SecOps Perspective EP123 The Good, the Bad, and the Epic of Threat Detection at Scale with Panther EP190 Unraveling the Security Data Fabric: Need, Benefits, and Futures “20 Years of SIEM: Celebrating My Dubious Anniversary” blog “RSA 2025: AI’s Promise vs. Security’s Past — A Reality Check” blog tl;dr security newsletter Introducing a RunReveal Model Context Protocol Server! MCP: Building Your SecOps AI Ecosystem AI Runbooks for Google SecOps: Security Operations with Model Context Protocol…
 
Guests: Eric Foster , CEO of Tenex.AI Venkata Koppaka , CTO of Tenex.AI Topics: Why is your AI-powered MDR special? Why start an MDR from scratch using AI? So why should users bet on an “AI-native” MDR instead of an MDR that has already got its act together and is now applying AI to an existing set of practices? What’s the current breakdown in labor between your human SOC analysts vs your AI SOC agents? How do you expect this to evolve and how will that change your unit economics? What tasks are humans uniquely good at today’s SOC? How do you expect that to change in the next 5 years? We hear concerns about SOC AI missing things –but we know humans miss things all the time too. So how do you manage buyer concerns about the AI agents missing things? Let’s talk about how you’re helping customers measure your efficacy overall. What metrics should organizations prioritize when evaluating MDR? Resources: Video EP223 AI Addressable, Not AI Solvable: Reflections from RSA 2025 (quote from Eric in the title!) EP10 SIEM Modernization? Is That a Thing? Tenex.AI blog “RSA 2025: AI’s Promise vs. Security’s Past — A Reality Check” blog The original ASO 10X SOC paper that started it all (2021) “Baby ASO: A Minimal Viable Transformation for Your SOC” blog “The Return of the Baby ASO: Why SOCs Still Suck?” blog " Learn Modern SOC and D&R Practices Using Autonomic Security Operations (ASO) Principles " blog…
 
Guest: Christine Sizemore , Cloud Security Architect, Google Cloud Topics: Can you describe the key components of an AI software supply chain, and how do they compare to those in a traditional software supply chain? I hope folks listening have heard past episodes where we talked about poisoning training data. What are the other interesting and unexpected security challenges and threats associated with the AI software supply chain? We like to say that history might not repeat itself but it does rhyme – what are the rhyming patterns in security practices people need to be aware of when it comes to securing their AI supply chains? We’ve talked a lot about technology and process–what are the organizational pitfalls to avoid when developing AI software? What organizational "smells" are associated with irresponsible AI development? We are all hearing about agentic security – so can we just ask the AI to secure itself? Top 3 things to do to secure AI software supply chain for a typical org? Resources: Video “Securing AI Supply Chain: Like Software, Only Not” blog (and paper) “Securing the AI software supply chain” webcast EP210 Cloud Security Surprises: Real Stories, Real Lessons, Real "Oh No!" Moments Protect AI issue database “Staying on top of AI Developments” “Office of the CISO 2024 Year in Review: AI Trust and Security” “Your Roadmap to Secure AI: A Recap” (2024) " RSA 2025: AI’s Promise vs. Security’s Past — A Reality Check" (references our "data as code" presentation)…
 
Hosts: David Homovich , Customer Advocacy Lead, Office of the CISO, Google Cloud Alicja Cade , Director, Office of the CISO, Google Cloud Guest: Christian Karam , Strategic Advisor and Investor Resources: EP2 Christian Karam on the Use of AI (as aired originally) The Cyber-Savvy Boardroom podcast site The Cyber-Savvy Boardroom podcast on Spotify The Cyber-Savvy Boardroom podcast on Apple Podcasts The Cyber-Savvy Boardroom podcast on YouTube Now hear this: A new podcast to help boards get cyber savvy (without the jargon) Board of Directors Insights Hub Guidance for Boards of Directors on How to Address AI Risk…
 
Guest: Diana Kelley , CSO at Protect AI Topics: Can you explain the concept of "MLSecOps" as an analogy with DevSecOps, with 'Dev' replaced by 'ML'? This has nothing to do with SecOps, right? What are the most critical steps a CISO should prioritize when implementing MLSecOps within their organization? What gets better when you do it? How do we adapt traditional security testing, like vulnerability scanning, SAST, and DAST, to effectively assess the security of machine learning models? Can we? In the context of AI supply chain security, what is the essential role of third-party assessments, particularly regarding data provenance? How can organizations balance the need for security logging in AI systems with the imperative to protect privacy and sensitive data? Do we need to decouple security from safety or privacy? What are the primary security risks associated with overprivileged AI agents, and how can organizations mitigate these risks? Top differences between LLM/chatbot AI security vs AI agent security? Resources: “Airline held liable for its chatbot giving passenger bad advice - what this means for travellers” “ChatGPT Spit Out Sensitive Data When Told to Repeat ‘Poem’ Forever” Secure by Design for AI by Protect AI “Securing AI Supply Chain: Like Software, Only Not” OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications OWASP Top 10 for AI Agents (draft) MITRE ATLAS “Demystifying AI Security: New Paper on Real-World SAIF Applications” (and paper ) LinkedIn Course: Security Risks in AI and ML: Categorizing Attacks and Failure Modes…
 
Guests: no guests, just us in the studio Topics: At RSA 2025, did we see solid, measurably better outcomes from AI use in security, or mostly just "sizzle" and good ideas with potential? Are the promises of an "AI SOC" repeating the mistakes seen with SOAR in previous years regarding fully automated security operations? Does "AI SOC" work according to RSA floor? How realistic is the vision expressed by some [yes, really!] that AI progress could lead to technical teams, including IT and security, shrinking dramatically or even to zero in a few years? Why do companies continue to rely on decades-old or “non-leading” security technologies, and what role does the concept of a "organizational change budget" play in this inertia? Is being "AI Native" fundamentally better for security technologies compared to adding AI capabilities to existing platforms, or is the jury still out? Got "an AI-native SIEM"? Be ready to explain how is yours better! Resources: EP172 RSA 2024: Separating AI Signal from Noise, SecOps Evolves, XDR Declines? EP119 RSA 2023 - What We Saw, What We Learned, and What We're Excited About EP70 Special - RSA 2022 Reflections - Securing the Past vs Securing the Future RSA (“RSAI”) Conference 2024 Powered by AI with AI on Top — AI Edition (Hey AI, Is This Enough AI?) [Anton’s RSA 2024 recap blog] New Paper: “Future of the SOC: Evolution or Optimization — Choose Your Path” (Paper 4 of 4.5) [talks about the change budget discussed]…
 
Guests: Kirstie Failey @ Google Threat Intelligence Group Scott Runnels @ Mandiant Incident Response Topics: What is the hardest thing about turning distinct incident reports into a fun to read and useful report like M-Trends ? How much are the lessons and recommendations skewed by the fact that they are all “post-IR” stories? Are “IR-derived” security lessons the best way to improve security? Isn’t this a bit like learning how to build safely from fires vs learning safety engineering? The report implies that F500 companies suffer from certain security issues despite their resources, does this automatically mean that smaller companies suffer from the same but more? "Dwell time" metrics sound obvious, but is there magic behind how this is done? Sometimes “dwell tie going down” is not automatically the defender’s win, right? What is the expected minimum dwell time? If “it depends”, then what does it depend on? Impactful outliers vs general trends (“by the numbers”), what teaches us more about security? Why do we seem to repeat the mistakes so much in security? Do we think it is useful to give the same advice repeatedly if the data implies that it is correct advice but people clearly do not do it? Resources: M-Trends 2025 report Mandiant Attack Lifecycle EP205 Cybersecurity Forecast 2025: Beyond the Hype and into the Reality EP147 Special: 2024 Security Forecast Report…
 
Guests: No guests [Tim in Vegas and Anton remote] Topics: So, another Next is done. Beyond the usual Vegas chaos, what was the overarching security theme or vibe you [Tim] felt dominated the conference this year? Thinking back to Next '24, what felt genuinely different this year versus just the next iteration of last year's trends? Last year, we pondered the 'Cloud Island' vs. 'Cloud Peninsula'. Based on Next 2025, is cloud security becoming more integrated with general cyber security, or is it still its own distinct domain? What wider trends did you observe, perhaps from the expo floor buzz or partner announcements, that security folks should be aware of? What was the biggest surprise for you at Next 2025? Something you absolutely didn't see coming? Putting on your prediction hats (however reluctantly): based on Next 2025, what do you foresee as the major cloud security focus or challenge for the industry in the next 12 months? If a busy podcast listener listening could only take one key message or action item away from everything announced and discussed at Next 2025, what should it be? Resources: EP169 Google Cloud Next 2024 Recap: Is Cloud an Island, So Much AI, Bots in SecOps…
 
Guests: Michael Cote , Cloud VRP Lead, Google Cloud Aadarsh Karumathil , Security Engineer, Google Cloud Topics: Vulnerability response at cloud-scale sounds very hard! How do you triage vulnerability reports and make sure we’re addressing the right ones in the underlying cloud infrastructure? How do you determine how much to pay for each vulnerability? What is the largest reward we paid? What was it for? What products get the most submissions? Is this driven by the actual product security or by trends and fashions like AI? What are the most likely rejection reasons? What makes for a very good - and exceptional? - vulnerability report? We hear we pay more for “exceptional” reports, what does it mean? In college Tim had a roommate who would take us out drinking on his Google web app vulnerability rewards. Do we have something similar for people reporting vulnerabilities in our cloud infrastructure? Are people making real money off this? How do we actually uniquely identify vulnerabilities in the cloud? CVE does not work well, right? What are the expected risk reduction benefits from Cloud VRP? Resources: Cloud VRP site Cloud VPR launch blog CVR: The Mines of Kakadûm…
 
Guest: Steve Ledzian , APAC CTO, Mandiant at Google Cloud Topics: We've seen a shift in how boards engage with cybersecurity. From your perspective, what's the most significant misconception boards still hold about cyber risk, particularly in the Asia Pacific region, and how has that impacted their decision-making? Cybersecurity is rife with jargon. If you could eliminate or redefine one overused term, which would it be and why? How does this overloaded language specifically hinder effective communication and action in the region? The Mandiant Attack Lifecycle is a well-known model. How has your experience in the East Asia region challenged or refined this model? Are there unique attack patterns or actor behaviors that necessitate adjustments? Two years post-acquisition, what's been the most surprising or unexpected benefit of the Google-Mandiant combination? M-Trends data provides valuable insights, particularly regarding dwell time. Considering the Asia Pacific region, what are the most significant factors reducing dwell time, and how do these trends differ from global averages? Given your expertise in Asia Pacific, can you share an observation about a threat actor's behavior that is often overlooked in broader cybersecurity discussions? Looking ahead, what's the single biggest cybersecurity challenge you foresee for organizations in the Asia Pacific region over the next five years, and what proactive steps should they be taking now to prepare? Resources: EP177 Cloud Incident Confessions: Top 5 Mistakes Leading to Breaches from Mandiant EP156 Living Off the Land and Attacking Critical Infrastructure: Mandiant Incident Deep Dive EP191 Why Aren't More Defenders Winning? Defender’s Advantage and How to Gain it!…
 
Guest: Henrique Teixeira , Senior VP of Strategy, Saviynt, ex-Gartner analyst Topics: How have you seen IAM evolve over the years, especially with the shift to the cloud, and now AI? What are some of the biggest challenges and opportunities these two shifts present? ITDR (Identity Threat Detection and Response) and ISPM (Identity Security Posture Management) are emerging areas in IAM. How do you see these fitting into the overall IAM landscape? Are they truly distinct categories or just extensions of existing IAM practices? Shouldn’t ITDR just be part of your Cloud DR or maybe even your SecOps tool of choice? It seems goofy to try to stand ITDR on its own when the impact of an identity compromise is entirely a function of what that identity can access or do, no? Regarding workload vs. human identity, could you elaborate on the unique security considerations for each? How does the rise of machine identities and APIs impact IAM approaches? We had a whole episode around machine identity that involved turtles–what have you seen in the machine identity space and how have you seen users mess it up? The cybersecurity world is full of acronyms. Any tips on how to create a memorable and impactful acronym? Resources: EP166 Workload Identity, Zero Trust and SPIFFE (Also Turtles!) EP182 ITDR: The Missing Piece in Your Security Puzzle or Yet Another Tool to Buy? EP127 Is IAM Really Fun and How to Stay Ahead of the Curve in Cloud IAM? EP94 Meet Cloud Security Acronyms with Anna Belak EP162 IAM in the Cloud: What it Means to Do It 'Right' with Kat Traxler EP199 Your Cloud IAM Top Pet Peeves (and How to Fix Them) EP188 Beyond the Buzzwords: Identity's True Role in Cloud and SaaS Security “Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works” book “Open” book…
 
Guest: Alex Polyakov , CEO at Adversa AI Topics: Adversa AI is known for its focus on AI red teaming and adversarial attacks. Can you share a particularly memorable red teaming exercise that exposed a surprising vulnerability in an AI system? What was the key takeaway for your team and the client? Beyond traditional adversarial attacks, what emerging threats in the AI security landscape are you most concerned about right now? What trips most clients, classic security mistakes in AI systems or AI-specific mistakes? Are there truly new mistakes in AI systems or are they old mistakes in new clothing? I know it is not your job to fix it, but much of this is unfixable, right? Is it a good idea to use AI to secure AI? Resources: EP84 How to Secure Artificial Intelligence (AI): Threats, Approaches, Lessons So Far AI Red Teaming Reasoning LLM US vs China: Jailbreak Deepseek, Qwen, O1, O3, Claude, Kimi Adversa AI blog Oops! 5 serious gen AI security mistakes to avoid Generative AI Fast Followership: Avoid These First Adopter Security Missteps…
 
Guest: James Campbell , CEO, Cado Security Chris Doman , CTO, Cado Security Topics: Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) vs Cloud Investigation and Response Automation( CIRA ) ... what’s the story here? There is an “R” in CDR, right? Can’t my (modern) SIEM/SOAR do that? What about this becoming a part of modern SIEM/SOAR in the future? What gets better when you deploy a CIRA (a) and your CIRA in particular (b)? Ephemerality and security, what are the fun overlaps? Does “E” help “S” or hurts it? What about compliance? Ephemeral compliance sounds iffy… Cloud investigations, what is special about them? How does CSPM intersect with this? Is CIRA part of CNAPP? A secret question, need to listen for it! Resources: EP157 Decoding CDR & CIRA: What Happens When SecOps Meets Cloud EP67 Cyber Defense Matrix and Does Cloud Security Have to DIE to Win? EP158 Ghostbusters for the Cloud: Who You Gonna Call for Cloud Forensics Cloud security incidents (Rami McCarthy) Cado resources…
 
Guest: Meador Inge , Security Engineer, Google Cloud Topics: Can you walk us through Google's typical threat modeling process? What are the key steps involved? Threat modeling can be applied to various areas. Where does Google utilize it the most? How do we apply this to huge and complex systems? How does Google keep its threat models updated? What triggers a reassessment? How does Google operationalize threat modeling information to prioritize security work and resource allocation? How does it influence your security posture? What are the biggest challenges Google faces in scaling and improving its threat modeling practices? Any stories where we got this wrong? How can LLMs like Gemini improve Google's threat modeling activities? Can you share examples of basic and more sophisticated techniques? What advice would you give to organizations just starting with threat modeling? Resources: EP12 Threat Models and Cloud Security EP150 Taming the AI Beast: Threat Modeling for Modern AI Systems with Gary McGraw EP200 Zero Touch Prod, Security Rings, and Foundational Services: How Google Does Workload Security EP140 System Hardening at Google Scale: New Challenges, New Solutions Threat Modeling manifesto EP176 Google on Google Cloud: How Google Secures Its Own Cloud Use Awesome Threat Modeling Adam Shostack “Threat Modeling: Designing for Security” book Ross Anderson “Security Engineering” book ”How to Solve It” book…
 
Guest: Archana Ramamoorthy , Senior Director of Product Management, Google Cloud Topics: You are responsible for building systems that need to comply with laws that are often mutually contradictory. It seems technically impossible to do, how do you do this? Google is not alone in being a global company with local customers and local requirements. How are we building systems that provide local compliance with global consistency in their use for customers who are similar in scale to us? Originally, Google had global systems synchronized around the entire planet–planet scale supercompute–with atomic clocks. How did we get to regionalized approach from there? Engineering takes a long time. How do we bring enough agility to product definition and engineering design to give our users robust foundations in our systems that also let us keep up with changing and diverging regulatory goals? What are some of the biggest challenges you face working in the trusted cloud space? Is there something you would like to share about being a woman leader in technology? How did you overcome the related challenges? Resources: Video “Compliance Without Compromise” by Jeanette Manfra (2020, still very relevant!) “Good to Great” book “Appreciative Leadership” book…
 
Loading …

به Player FM خوش آمدید!

Player FM در سراسر وب را برای یافتن پادکست های با کیفیت اسکن می کند تا همین الان لذت ببرید. این بهترین برنامه ی پادکست است که در اندروید، آیفون و وب کار می کند. ثبت نام کنید تا اشتراک های شما در بین دستگاه های مختلف همگام سازی شود.

 

icon Daily Deals
icon Daily Deals
icon Daily Deals

راهنمای مرجع سریع

در حین کاوش به این نمایش گوش دهید
پخش