We promise we are not as Horrible as you think at video games, well maybe. This is a podcast based on current video game culture and much more. Join us for a whole new experience with gaming, we’re not your average gamers we are The Horrible Gamers!
…
continue reading
Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
Checked 5d ago
اضافه شده در fifty هفته پیش
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Richard Hoeg. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمتها، گرافیکها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Richard Hoeg یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آنها آپلود و ارائه میشوند. اگر فکر میکنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخهبرداری شما استفاده میکند، میتوانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal
Player FM - برنامه پادکست
با برنامه Player FM !
با برنامه Player FM !
Virtual Legality
علامت گذاری همه پخش شده(نشده) ...
Manage series 3555593
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Richard Hoeg. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمتها، گرافیکها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Richard Hoeg یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آنها آپلود و ارائه میشوند. اگر فکر میکنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخهبرداری شما استفاده میکند، میتوانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal
Virtual Legality is a continuing series discussing the law, video games, software, and everything digital, hosted by Richard Hoeg, of the Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (Hoeg Law).
…
continue reading
784 قسمت
علامت گذاری همه پخش شده(نشده) ...
Manage series 3555593
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Richard Hoeg. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمتها، گرافیکها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Richard Hoeg یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آنها آپلود و ارائه میشوند. اگر فکر میکنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخهبرداری شما استفاده میکند، میتوانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal
Virtual Legality is a continuing series discussing the law, video games, software, and everything digital, hosted by Richard Hoeg, of the Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (Hoeg Law).
…
continue reading
784 قسمت
همه قسمت ها
×In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg delves into the complexities surrounding Roblox, its platform, and the recent scrutiny it faces. He begins with an overview of Roblox's popularity and the criticisms it has attracted. The discussion then shifts to the SEC's investigation into Roblox, explaining securities and the implications of Bloomberg's reporting on child safety. Richard also examines short selling, focusing on Hindenburg Research's report and its potential impacts on Roblox. The episode further explores user screening, COPPA implications, and the importance of transparency in ongoing investigations, concluding with closing remarks and audience engagement. SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify.com LINKS ROBLOX INVESTIGATION https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/sec-confirms-active-and-ongoing-investigation-into-roblox https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-07/sec-confirms-game-service-roblox-part-of-active-investigation FOIA https://www.foia.gov/about.html https://www.foia.gov/ AGENCIES https://www.sec.gov/about https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/contact/complaints https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-ceos/keeping-children-safe-online (0:14) Introduction to the episode (0:43) Overview of Roblox's platform, popularity, and criticisms (2:03) SEC's investigation into Roblox and explanation of securities (3:53) Bloomberg's reporting and child safety allegations against Roblox (7:16) Short selling, Hindenburg Research's report, and potential impacts (10:23) User screening, COPPA implications, and transparency in investigations (21:11) Closing remarks and audience engagement…
In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg explores the prospect of Microsoft/TikTok acquisition talks. He examines the TikTok ban, enforcement challenges, and network impacts. Hoeg analyzes the performative aspects of January 19th, discusses bills of attainder, and the courts' decisions on both attainder and First Amendment law. He critiques the court's reasoning, discusses TikTok's business restrictions, and debates divestiture versus confiscation. Richard also touches on the Trump administration's actions, Congressional provisions, First Amendment concerns, and the Supreme Court's role. The episode concludes with insights into Microsoft's negotiation strategy and political considerations. SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL YOUTUBE - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5RTzzeCFurWTPLm8usDkQ/ PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify.com/ LINKS INTRO https://www.reuters.com/technology/trump-says-microsoft-is-talks-acquire-tiktok-2025-01-28/ THE BAN https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-118publ50/pdf/PLAW-118publ50.pdf https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bill_of_attainder https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/24-1113/24-1113-2024-12-06.pdf?ts=1733499080 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf THE DELAY https://apnews.com/article/trump-tiktok-ban-da11df6d59c17e2c17eea40c4042386d https://www.npr.org/2025/01/20/nx-s1-5268701/trump-executive-order-tiktok-ban https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/application-of-protecting-americans-from-foreign-adversary-controlled-applications-act-to-tiktok/ THE PROBLEM https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-ii/clauses/348 https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-ban-executive-order-trump-0bbae2d2d6f102944f41bb75ad40ce69 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-brushes-tiktok-national-security-concerns-calling-50/story?id=117923145 THE SOLUTION? https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2025/01/03/the-golden-opportunity-for-american-ai/ (0:00) Introduction and episode overview (0:46) Microsoft and TikTok acquisition talks and Protecting Americans Act (2:10) TikTok ban implications, enforcement, and network impact (4:54) Performative aspects and bill of attainder analysis (7:53) Court's decision and discussion on law's punitive nature (9:48) Court's tests and critique of reasoning (11:11) TikTok's business restrictions and divestiture vs. confiscation debate (14:08) Case history, Trump administration, and executive orders (17:10) Congressional act provisions and First Amendment considerations (20:29) Supreme Court's decisions on TikTok's shutdown and implications (22:06) Executive order analysis and presidential powers (24:33) Legal challenges to non-enforcement and take care clause implications (28:31) Enforcement discretion and Congressional conditions for TikTok (32:26) Legal challenges to Trump's order and TikTok's potential sale (34:09) Microsoft's negotiation role and political strategy (37:34) Final thoughts, community engagement, and channel support (39:33) Legal disclaimer and closing remarks…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
1 FTC Takes on Genshin Impact | Loot Boxes, Dark Patterns, and Legal Showdowns 1:16:04
1:16:04
پخش در آینده
پخش در آینده
لیست ها
پسندیدن
دوست داشته شد1:16:04![icon](https://imagehost.player.fm/icons/general/red-pin.svg)
In this episode, Richard Hoeg examines the FTC's lawsuit against Genshin Impact, focusing on loot boxes and transparency. He discusses the FTC's charges, including concerns over "dark pattern tactics" and COPPA compliance, and the implications for free-to-play games. The episode explores Hoyoverse's business practices, misleading loot box disclosures, and the FTC's authority under sections 5 and 6g. Richard also addresses marketing to children, settlement terms, and the broader impact on the gaming industry, concluding with a look at internal FTC debates. FTC ACTION https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/genshin-impact-game-developer-will-be-banned-selling-lootboxes-teens-under-16-without-parental https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/cognosphere_complaint.pdf LAWS https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-312 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/45 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=false&edition=prelim&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title15-section46 CONTROVERSY/AUTHORITY https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10635 https://businesslaw.osbar.org/2024/12/31/federal-trade-commission-non-compete-ban-december-2024-update/ https://www.beckersasc.com/asc-news/trump-administration-likely-to-end-ftc-efforts-to-ban-noncompetes-report.html https://www.econotimes.com/Lina-Khan-Resigns-as-FTC-Chair-Amid-Antitrust-Legacy-1699716 https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-cognosphere-concurrence.pdf (0:00) Introduction to the episode (0:46) FTC lawsuit against Genshin Impact and loot boxes (3:14) FTC's charges against Genshin Impact and transparency issues (5:25) FTC's concerns with "dark pattern tactics" and COPPA requirements (7:57) Implications for free-to-play games and FTC enforcement (10:34) Jurisdiction and legal basis for FTC's case against Genshin Impact (16:50) Specifics of COPPA rule and FTC's interpretation (20:05) Broader implications for the gaming industry and age gates (24:29) FTC's investigation into Hoyoverse's business practices (31:38) Currency and loot box practices in Genshin Impact (37:14) Hoyoverse's advertising and influencer collaborations (39:48) Misleading disclosure of loot box odds and unfair practices (47:31) Gaming business models and FTC's focus on children (51:22) FTC's authority and rulemaking under section 5 and 6g (55:50) Settlement terms and broader video game industry implications (1:00:00) Major questions doctrine and anti-delegation concerns (1:03:36) FTC and loot boxes, plus ban on noncompetes (1:05:43) Andrew Ferguson's role and allegations against Cognosphere LLC (1:07:26) Loot boxes, odds, and misleading advertising (1:09:46) Virtual currency complexity and FTC's consumer protection stance (1:12:21) Marketing to children and differing opinions within FTC (1:14:23) Conclusion, viewer engagement, and disclaimer…
In this episode, Richard Hoeg explores the US Department of Defense's CMC designation and its business impacts on Tencent Holdings. He covers legal background, executive orders, and insights from Bloomberg, analyzing market reactions and clarifying misunderstandings. The discussion includes the National Defense Authorization Act, Trump's executive orders, and more. Hoeg provides historical context, examines Tencent's situation, and the Department of Defense's role in US-China relations. He also considers potential actions by the future administrations and their effects on Tencent's global market presence, concluding with national security debates and possible legal proceedings. LINKS MILITARY DESIGNATION https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/6/24337489/tencent-catl-us-defense-department-chinese-military-companies https://archive.ph/FPpBi https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-00070.pdf TRUMP/1237 https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/12/trump-bans-investments-in-companies-that-aid-chinas-military.html https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/11/17/2020-25459/addressing-the-threat-from-securities-investments-that-finance-communist-chinese-military-companies https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2328894/dod-releases-list-of-additional-companies-in-accordance-with-section-1237-of-fy/ MCFs AND 1260H https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/chinese-military-civil-fusion-and-section-1260h-congress-incorporates-defense-contributors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookings_Institution https://www.cmtradelaw.com/2024/02/dod-is-making-its-list-and-checking-it-twice-dod-updates-1260h-chinese-military-companies-list/ LEGAL ACTION? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9q78wn9g8zo https://www.eurogamer.net/tencent-threatens-legal-proceedings-if-us-doesnt-overturn-decision-to-label-it-as-a-chinese-military-company https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/worlds-biggest-game-publisher-tencent-threaten-to-sue-us-government-for-listing-them-as-a-chinese-military-company https://static.www.tencent.com/uploads/2025/01/07/ed277c23e9fe0fc870fb9f02350e7658.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/19/24274153/dji-sues-us-dod-chinese-military-company (0:00) Introduction and overview of the topic (1:12) US Department of Defense's designation explained and potential business impacts (2:35) Legal background, executive orders, and Bloomberg article insights (3:33) Market reactions, Citigroup analyst perspective, and clarification of sanctions (5:39) Examination of William M. Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act and Federal Register details (7:27) Trump's executive order, section 1237 vs 1260h, and legal implications (10:22) Historical context, reporting requirements, and legislative amendments (13:05) Definitions, implications for Tencent, and legal interpretations (15:04) Department of Defense's discretion and implications for US-China relations (17:23) Potential future actions by the Biden administration and Brookings Institution's perspective (20:49) Specific prohibitions and overview of Tencent's global market presence (22:57) Tencent's gaming investments and impact of US designation (25:02) Clarification on the CMC list, potential legal proceedings, and DJI precedent (30:12) US government actions, national security debate, and closing remarks…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into the recent delay of Assassin's Creed Shadows and the broader financial challenges faced by Ubisoft. He discusses Ubisoft's official announcements, strategic updates, restructuring efforts, and cost reduction measures. Hoeg explores the legal implications surrounding potential sales of Ubisoft, along with the financial impact of game cancellations. He provides an analysis of Ubisoft's recent game performance and shares insights from Bloomberg regarding Ubisoft shares and Tencent's interest. The episode also covers organizational changes within Ubisoft, before concluding with a sponsor message, disclaimer, and closing remarks. *** SUPPORT THE SHOW UTREON/PLAYEUR - https://playeur.com/c/aT-zMZf4XVIxwix2pAVNjE/videos/virtual-legality PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify.com/ LINKS DELAY ANNOUNCEMENTS https://x.com/assassinscreed/status/1838971189722562906 https://x.com/AlmightyJCaesar/status/1877406586890568139 STRATEGIC CHANGES https://staticctf.ubisoft.com/8aefmxkxpxwl/1wUjJWUQSIVMlZbKQ2707e/c0b1cd1c71ab30838e51d5e24764577f/Press_release_09_01_2025_vfinal.pdf ARTICLES https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-04/tencent-guillemot-family-are-said-to-consider-buyout-of-ubisoft?srnd=undefined https://www.videogameschronicle.com/features/opinion/the-crisis-at-ubisoft-has-deepened-and-the-end-result-is-inevitable/ LAST STAND MEDIA https://www.patreon.com/LastStandMedia THE BITCAST https://www.youtube.com/@seasonedgaming NOTHING YET TO DISCLOSE https://www.ign.com/articles/ubisoft-investors-grill-ceo-cfo-on-potential-tencent-sale-delays-and-financial-woes https://www.gamespot.com/articles/ubisoft-refuses-to-comment-on-tencent-rumors-but-says-its-exploring-options-to-maximize-value/1100-6528718/ https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_corpfin/princdisclos.pdf TENCENT https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/tech/tencent-catl-us-list-china-military-companies-intl-hnk/index.html (0:00) Introduction to the episode and Assassin's Creed Shadows delays (1:52) Ubisoft's official announcements and financial challenges (5:37) Ubisoft's strategic updates, restructuring, and cost reductions (11:57) Legal implications of Ubisoft's potential sales (14:18) Game cancellations, geography, and financial impact (17:09) Ubisoft's recent game performance analysis (19:13) Bloomberg's insights on Ubisoft shares and Tencent's interest (23:27) Organizational changes at Ubisoft (24:21) Sponsor: PlayYour and Patreon support (24:54) Disclaimer and closing remarks…
In this episode, Richard Hoeg presents a special anniversary edition, sharing personal insights and experiences following a stroke. He discusses the mental rehabilitation journey, offering a post-stroke perspective on the challenges faced, including financial stress. Richard delves into energy management strategies and reflects on the future outlook, both personally and professionally. The episode concludes with closing remarks and a disclaimer, providing a thoughtful and introspective look into recovery and resilience. (0:00) Introduction and Anniversary Specials Overview (1:07) Stroke Experiences and Mental Rehabilitation (3:24) Post-Stroke Perspective and Financial Stress (5:37) Energy Management and Future Outlook (6:25) Closing Remarks and Disclaimer…
In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into the potential acquisition of Kadokawa by Sony, examining the pricing process regulatory questions and more. Richard explores Sony's stake in Kadokawa, the company's anime involvement, and potential antitrust issues. He provides insights into Sony's acquisition history and financials, the implications of leaked information, and the role of cash in acquisitions. The episode also touches on Tencent's influence, anime market monopolization worries, and jurisdictional challenges for international companies, concluding with thoughts on regulatory concerns and FromSoft's potential independence. LINKS INITIAL REPORTS https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/sony-talks-buy-media-powerhouse-behind-elden-ring-sources-say-2024-11-19/ https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/sony-is-reportedly-in-talks-to-acquire-fromsoftware-owner-kadokawa/ LOI https://ssl4.eir-parts.net/doc/9468/ir_material7/240956/00.pdf https://www.acc.com/sites/default/files/resources/vl/membersonly/SampleFormPolicy/1386759_1.pdf PRICE https://companiesmarketcap.com/kadokawa/marketcap/ https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/SONY/sony/cash-on-hand https://firstpagesage.com/business/valuation-ebitda-multiples-for-tech-companies/ https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/65345-59#stock https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/9468.T/key-statistics/ https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MSFT/microsoft/cash-on-hand https://news.microsoft.com/2022/01/18/microsoft-to-acquire-activision-blizzard-to-bring-the-joy-and-community-of-gaming-to-everyone-across-every-device/ https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/atvi/financials/ratios/ TENCENT AND FROMSOFTWARE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kadokawa_Corporation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FromSoftware ANIME AND REGULATORS https://comicbook.com/anime/news/sony-kadokawa-anime-monopoly/ https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023_merger_guidelines_final_12.18.2023.pdf (0:00) Introduction to Sony's potential acquisition of Kadokawa (1:09) Pronunciation and initial report overview (1:44) Acquisition process and regulatory approvals (2:31) Microsoft's Activision purchase comparison (3:05) Game exclusivity and regulatory concerns (4:11) Sony's stake in Kadokawa and pricing (5:22) Kadokawa's anime involvement and antitrust issues (6:13) Sony's acquisition history and financials (8:51) Understanding the letter of intent in deals (13:17) Implications of leaked acquisition information (23:49) Merger and acquisition deal numbers (25:22) Company valuation with EBITDA (29:27) Role of cash in acquisitions (31:04) Microsoft's Activision acquisition implications (33:39) Tencent's influence on Sony's Kadokawa bid (37:43) Anime market monopolization concerns (41:13) Antitrust markets and Sony-Kadokawa deal implications (44:44) Conclusion and viewer support (46:03) CMA considerations on streaming platforms (47:24) Jurisdictional challenges for international companies (47:59) Digital product loss and Sony's closing information (48:48) Kadokawa's stock compensation considerations (50:11) FromSoft's control and exclusivity agreements (51:34) Sony-Kadokawa special agreement potential (53:12) Regulatory concerns with Sony's studio additions (54:08) Sony region lock and FromSoft game access (55:09) FromSoft's potential independence announcement (56:05) Final thoughts and episode closing…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
1 Can Nintendo's Patents TAKE DOWN Palworld? | A Lawyer Discusses 1:10:04
1:10:04
پخش در آینده
پخش در آینده
لیست ها
پسندیدن
دوست داشته شد1:10:04![icon](https://imagehost.player.fm/icons/general/red-pin.svg)
Richard Hoeg dives into the ongoing legal battle between Nintendo and PocketPair, focusing on the intricacies of patent law and its implications for the gaming industry. Starting with the background on Palworld, he explores Nintendo's legal actions and the broader context of patent strategies. The episode examines social media reactions, the strength of Nintendo's case, and the potential for settlement. Richard describes patent laws between Japan and the US, discusses Nintendo's history with lawfare, and considers the impact on public perception. He analyzes the role of patent trolls, the nemesis system patent, and the balance between lawsuit motivations and innovation, concluding with community engagement. SOURCE LINKS POCKETPAIR https://www.pocketpair.jp/news/20241108 TWEETS https://x.com/seosaur/status/1854930016238256230 https://x.com/Schwifter_/status/1855481661086974033 https://x.com/Florian4Gamers/status/1854879805365236216 PATENTS https://patents.google.com/patent/JP7545191B1/en#relatedApplications https://patents.google.com/patent/JP7493117B2/en?oq=7493117#relatedApplications https://patents.google.com/patent/JP7528390B2/en#relatedApplications https://patents.google.com/patent/JP7398425B2/en?oq=7493117#relatedApplications JAPAN https://www.jpo.go.jp/e/faq/yokuaru/patent.html US https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/patent https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/international-ip-treaties https://www.wipo.int/directory/en/details.jsp?country_code=JP CONTINUATIONS https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12446?msockid=1f7d7163a5b163ab143062bca4a4629e DAMAGES https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2024/11/08/nintendos-palworld-lawsuit-takes-an-absurd-turn/ https://x.com/IGN/status/1855007664662561234 BULLYING? https://gamesfray.com/nintendo-the-pokemon-company-v-pocketpair-palworld-patent-infringement-lawsuit-attempts-to-monopolize-game-rules/?utm_source=syndication (0:00) Introduction and episode overview (1:33) Background on Palworld and Nintendo's legal actions (3:17) Patent discussion (6:48) Social media reactions and detailed patent analysis (22:08) Continuation: Nintendo's legal strategy and case strength (25:11) Potential settlement and implications for Pocketpair (27:47) Understanding patents and international patent law (38:59) Patent strategies (45:21) Patent claims in gaming: Legal and industry impact (51:18) Patent and copyright laws: Japan vs. the US (53:15) Lawfare in the Nintendo-PocketPair case and calculating damages (58:11) Nintendo's legal history and public perception (1:04:41) Patent trolls and novelty in gaming patents (1:07:01) Nintendo's lawsuit motivations and innovation balance (1:08:14) The nemesis system patent discussion (1:09:06) Closing remarks and community engagement…
In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into California's AB 2426, focusing on digital content ownership and its implications for platforms like the PlayStation Network. He examines legal perspectives on digital goods, compelled speech, and transparency laws. Assembly Member Jackie Irwin's press release and task force recommendations are explored, along with a detailed breakdown of the new law's definitions and provisions. Richard discusses potential adaptations by companies, false advertising concerns, and ambiguities within the law. The episode also covers DRM, online check-ins, and listener questions, concluding with opinions on media preservation, the EU's gaming initiatives, and emulator shutdowns. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE (LINKS) ARTICLES https://www.gamefile.news/p/california-ab2426-crew-call-of-duty https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/26/24254922/california-digital-purchase-disclosure-law-ab-2426 https://www.ign.com/articles/californias-new-law-will-force-storefronts-to-disclose-that-buyers-dont-actually-own-their-digitally-purchased-media https://kotaku.com/california-ab-2426-digital-games-the-crew-new-law-psn https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/california-cracks-down-on-misleading-online-purchases-with-ab-2426 LAWS https://a42.asmdc.org/press-releases/20240925-governor-newsom-signs-ab-2426-law-increases-transparency-surrounding https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/109 https://digitaldemocracy.calmatters.org/bills/ca_202320240ab2426 TOTILO TWEETS https://x.com/stephentotilo/status/1839675181129675168 https://x.com/stephentotilo/status/1841152304457634075 PSN TERMS https://www.playstation.com/en-us/legal/psn-terms-of-service/#content-license-and-restrictions (0:00) Introduction to California's AB 2426 and digital content ownership (5:16) Legal perspectives on digital goods and PlayStation Network's terms (9:07) Compelled speech, transparency laws, and public understanding (14:02) Assembly Member Jackie Irwin's press release and task force recommendations (19:02) Detailed breakdown of the new law's definitions and provisions (23:11) How companies might adapt to new licensing requirements and consumer behavior (27:09) The law as false advertising, exemptions, and ambiguities (32:29) Online check-ins, DRM, and the law's effectiveness (34:37) Sponsor: Acknowledgment and community support (35:17) Listener questions and discussion on the law's adoption and impact (47:25) Opinions on the EU's stop killing games initiative and emulator shutdowns (50:35) Media preservation and impact on accessibility (53:00) Closing remarks and engagement reminders…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
1 Patent World | A Lawyer's Take on Nintendo vs PalWorld 1:05:44
1:05:44
پخش در آینده
پخش در آینده
لیست ها
پسندیدن
دوست داشته شد1:05:44![icon](https://imagehost.player.fm/icons/general/red-pin.svg)
Lawyer Richard Hoeg (Hoeg Law) provides an in-depth analysis of Nintendo's lawsuit against PocketPair, focusing on the legal intricacies of patent infringement claims. He revisits the background of Palworld and explores international and Japanese patent law implications on the case. Richard dissects the differences between trademark, patent, and copyright protection, and speculates on PocketPair's legal response and strategy. The episode explores the risks associated with evoking established brands, the role of patent functions, and the potential impact on game releases. Concluding with viewer comments and a discussion on Nintendo's motives, Hoeg offers insights into the broader implications for the gaming industry. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE (LINKS) CORPORATE STATEMENTS https://www.nintendo.co.jp/corporate/release/en/2024/240919.html https://www.pocketpair.jp/news/news16 https://corporate.pokemon.co.jp/media/news/detail/335.html UNDERSTANDING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/trademark-patent-copyright https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/PatentBasics_UCR_11May2022.pdf https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/PatentBasics_UCR_11May2022.pdf https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0248 JAPAN https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/pursuing-international-ip-protection/japan https://www.ymf-law.com/post/defenses-to-patent-infringement-in-japanese-litigation ANALYSTS AND ARTICLES https://x.com/Jenbox360/status/1836709372077953278 https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/nintendo-s-patent-lawsuit-shows-it-s-given-up-making-the-case-that-palworld-s-characters-are-similar-to-pokemon-s-analyst-explains https://www.ign.com/articles/nintendo-vs-palworld-killer-patent-may-be-about-the-mechanic-of-catching-pokmon https://www.eurogamer.net/exceedingly-plausible-nintendo-crafted-patent-claims-to-specifically-target-palworld-says-ip-expert https://www.dualshockers.com/nintendo-lawsuit-halts-palworld-ps5-release-in-japan/ PC GAMER LAWYER INTERVIEW https://www.pcgamer.com/games/survival-crafting/a-videogame-patent-lawyer-breaks-down-nintendos-risky-palworld-lawsuit-it-definitely-feels-like-a-punishment/ (0:00) Introduction and Overview of Nintendo's Lawsuit Against PocketPair (1:07) Recap: Palworld, Copyright Law, and Nintendo's Legal Action (2:31) International Law and Japanese Patent Law (3:49) Analysis of Nintendo's Patent Infringement Claims (5:28) Predictions for PocketPair's Legal Outcome (7:08) Clarifying the Nature of Nintendo's Patent-Based Lawsuit (8:16) Trademark, Patent, and Copyright: Understanding the Differences (13:19) PocketPair's Response and Legal Strategy Speculation (16:17) Detailed Discussion on Patent Implications in Legal Disputes (22:15) Copyright vs. Patent Protection in Nintendo's Strategy (24:13) Risks of Evoking Established Brands and Intellectual Property (26:25) Patent Functions and Relevance to Nintendo's Case (28:48) Pocket Pair's Potential Legal Strategies and Patent Analysis (33:07) Divisional Patents and Their Litigation Significance (37:42) Adjustments to Avoid Infringement; Journalistic Speculations (40:34) Strategic Impact of the Lawsuit on Game Releases (41:46) Analyzing Nintendo's Motives and Patent Approaches (47:12) Proving Patent Infringement and Filing Scopes (50:20) Nintendo's Goodwill and Japanese Patent Law Discussion (52:09) Viewer Comments and Encouragement to Read Relevant Articles (54:05) Nintendo's Patent Strategy and Related Gaming Discussions (59:13) Miscellaneous: Settlements, Weekend Plans, and Board Games (1:01:06) Game Mechanics, Patents, and Software Expression (1:04:25) Closing Remarks and Legal Disclaimer…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
1 Playing Games or Real Intentions? | Dr. Disrespect, Illegality, and Immorality (VL785) 1:16:00
1:16:00
پخش در آینده
پخش در آینده
لیست ها
پسندیدن
دوست داشته شد1:16:00![icon](https://imagehost.player.fm/icons/general/red-pin.svg)
Richard Hoeg dives into Midnight Society's statement about Guy Beam (Doctor Disrespect), explores the controversy surrounding his Twitch ban, analyzes California law on harmful communication with minors, and discusses a Bloomberg article and legal considerations related to the case. LINKS TWITTER LEAK https://x.com/evoli/status/1804309358106546676 MIDNIGHT SOCIETY https://x.com/12am/status/1805341504086622355 https://x.com/fourzerotwo/status/1805671144412049732 ARTICLES https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/streamer-dr-disrespect-axed-by-his-gaming-company/ar-BB1oRnXU?ocid=BingNewsSerp https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/26/dr-disrespect-loses-40-000-followers-streamers-fans-cut-ties-21106425/?ico=mosaic_gaming https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/dr-disrespect-signs-multi-year-deal-stay-twitch-1283878/ https://gamerant.com/turtle-beach-dr-disrespect-partnership-end/ TWITCH TERMS https://www.twitch.tv/p/en/legal/terms-of-service/ https://safety.twitch.tv/s/article/Community-Guidelines?language=en_US LAW https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-288-2/ BLOOMBERG https://x.com/cecianasta/status/1805648131754746329 https://www.bloomberg.com./news/articles/2024-06-25/youtuber-dr-disrespect-was-allegedly-kicked-off-twitch-for-messaging-minor?sref=9YEaDeJj DISRESPECT STATEMENT https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1805668256088572089 TWEETS https://x.com/chrissyxchi/status/1805747160547475765 https://x.com/rellim714/status/1805734437445128543 YOUTUBE TERMS https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801999?hl=en&ref_topic=9282679 https://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms (0:00) Introduction (2:10) Midnight Society's statement on Guy Beam (Doctor Disrespect) (4:08) Dispute over interaction details and Twitch's reaction (6:12) Background on Doctor Disrespect's Twitch ban and statement (11:16) California law on harmful matter and communication with minors (18:13) Bloomberg article on Doctor Disrespect's ban (23:48) Doctor Disrespect's statement and legal considerations…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
1 Whisper Campaign | A Lawyer looks at the Dr. Disrespect Twitch Accusations (VL784) 1:03:16
1:03:16
پخش در آینده
پخش در آینده
لیست ها
پسندیدن
دوست داشته شد1:03:16![icon](https://imagehost.player.fm/icons/general/red-pin.svg)
Richard Hoeg discusses the Doctor Disrespect Twitch exclusivity deal, the impact of Mixer's shutdown, and the 2022 legal settlement. He explores Twitch's whisper function, California penal code implications, and Doctor Disrespect's response to allegations, wrapping up with viewer questions and engagement. LINKS PREVIOUSLY ON... https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1zDCgJzZUy98pOuP1cC8o7nraoJEcmuG https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/dr-disrespect-signs-multi-year-deal-stay-twitch-1283878/ https://www.windowscentral.com/mixer-what-went-wrong https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2020/06/28/statement-respond-why-dr-disrespect-banned-from-twitch-for-mysterious-reasons/#2f9151d12c0e https://x.com/Slasher/status/1276742960286183424 https://x.com/Shannon_Liao/status/1276617617730568195 https://x.com/drdisrespect/status/1277060051744591872 https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1502004274993131525 THE PRESENT https://blog.twitch.tv/en/2015/06/10/psst-hey-you-let-s-whisper-2a84ac496804/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whispering_campaign https://x.com/evoli/status/1804309358106546676 https://x.com/HoegLaw/status/1804484984213741891 https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1804337822415097955 https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1804577136998776878 THE FUTURE https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-288-4/ https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/info_bulletins/2020-dle-17.pdf https://www.twitch.tv/p/en/legal/privacy-notice/ https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/07/encrypted-dms/ https://techcrunch.com/2023/03/06/elon-musk-says-twitter-aiming-to-roll-out-encrypted-dms-this-month/ https://x.com/HUN2R/status/1804538910099313132 (0:00) Introduction and episode overview (1:19) Viewer questions and engagement (1:33) Background on Doctor Disrespect and Twitch (2:35) Doctor Disrespect's Twitch exclusivity deal (4:40) Mixer shutdown and its impact (8:28) Legal settlement in 2022 (10:22) Twitch's whisper function and potential implications (25:08) Doctor Disrespect's response to allegations (35:20) Analysis of California penal code (56:08) Final thoughts and wrap-up…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
Richard Hoeg delves into Adobe's new terms and conditions, addressing artists' concerns and examining the legal implications. He discusses professional obligations, confidentiality issues, and the broad language in Adobe's terms, along with AI concerns and the impact on user trust. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE ARTIST CONCERNS (TWEETS) https://x.com/Stretchedwiener/status/1798153619285708909 https://x.com/SamSantala/status/1798292952219091042 https://x.com/Gahadmor/status/1798601215703761272 ADOBE GENERAL TERMS https://www.adobe.com/legal/terms.html ADOBE CONTENT ANALYSIS RESTRICTIONS (INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE) https://helpx.adobe.com/manage-account/using/machine-learning-faq.html ARCHIVES/ALL SOFTWARE TERMS https://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms/licenses-terms-archive.html https://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms.html (0:00) Introduction and episode overview (1:12) Adobe's new terms and conditions and artists' concerns (3:31) Richard's perspective as a lawyer (5:02) Professional obligations and confidentiality concerns (7:07) Examination of Adobe's general terms of use (9:47) Detailed review of Adobe's access to user content (15:43) Limits on Adobe's use of user content (18:31) Broad language in Adobe's terms of use (23:07) AI concerns and Adobe's future plans (24:19) Concluding thoughts on Adobe's terms and user trust…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
1 TikTok Sues the US | Can They Stop the Ban? (VL782) 1:30:30
1:30:30
پخش در آینده
پخش در آینده
لیست ها
پسندیدن
دوست داشته شد1:30:30![icon](https://imagehost.player.fm/icons/general/red-pin.svg)
In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into the legal complexities surrounding TikTok's ban and its implications on freedom of expression and the limits of congressional authority. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE NPR ARTICLE https://www.npr.org/2024/05/07/1246532784/tiktok-ban-us-court-biden-congress THE STATUTE https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8038/text THE LAWSUIT https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24651190/tiktok-petition.pdf ANALYSIS https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C3-2/ALDE_00013187/ (0:00) Introduction, Remembering Community Member Shareen (7:06) TikTok's Legal Arguments (20:17) Analysis of the Ban's Implications: First Amendment, Freedom of Expression, and the Bill of Attainder Clause (32:54) Examination of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (41:48) Future Outlook: Changing Political Landscape and Potential Legislative Actions Against TikTok (51:08) Breakdown of TikTok's Ownership and Funding, and Legal Battles with President Trump's executive order (1:01:06) TikTok's First Amendment Rights in its Editorial and Publishing Activities and Legal Challenge Against the Act (1:14:26) Discussion on the National Security Agreement with TikTok and Government's Failure to Provide Alternatives (1:20:18) TikTok's Request for a Declaratory Judgment that the Act is Unconstitutional and Audience's Comments (1:27:35) Community Questions: Personal Experience with TikTok, Opinion on China's Ban, and U.S Government's Stance (1:29:33) Closing Remarks and Remembering Community Member Shareen…
V
Virtual Legality
![Virtual Legality podcast artwork](/static/images/64pixel.png)
1 Can the FTC Really Ban Non-Competition Provisions? (VL781) 1:23:17
1:23:17
پخش در آینده
پخش در آینده
لیست ها
پسندیدن
دوست داشته شد1:23:17![icon](https://imagehost.player.fm/icons/general/red-pin.svg)
In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the complexities of Non-Compete Agreements, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and its implications. He examines the FTC's rulemaking on non-competes, the benefits and potential impacts of such agreements, and the origins of the FTC Act. He also discusses the non-delegation doctrine's potential impacts on FTC's authority. The episode wraps up with a Q&A session. (0:00) Introduction and Overview of Non-Compete Agreements (8:18) Understanding the Federal Trade Commission Act and Its Implications (14:07) The Proposed Non-Compete Rule and its Implications (23:01) Purpose and Impact of the FTC's Rulemaking on Non-Competes (33:35) Benefits and Potential Impact of Non-Compete Agreements (38:14) Origins and Intent of the FTC Act and Section 5 (44:26) Discussing the National Petroleum Refinance Association vs the FTC Case (51:03) The Non-Delegation Doctrine and Its Potential Impact on FTC's Authority (1:00:15) Handling Noncompete Provisions Amidst the FTC's Rule (1:03:02) Transition to Q&A and Acknowledgement of Viewer Support…
به Player FM خوش آمدید!
Player FM در سراسر وب را برای یافتن پادکست های با کیفیت اسکن می کند تا همین الان لذت ببرید. این بهترین برنامه ی پادکست است که در اندروید، آیفون و وب کار می کند. ثبت نام کنید تا اشتراک های شما در بین دستگاه های مختلف همگام سازی شود.