Revisited: Can a machine be an artist?

The Science Briefing

محتوای ارائه شده توسط LiSTNR Support. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط LiSTNR Support یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

3y ago 13:49

MP3•خانه قسمت

بایگانی مجموعه ها ("فیدهای غیر فعال" status)

When? This feed was archived on August 17, 2024 17:09 (1y ago). Last successful fetch was on February 26, 2024 19:30 (1+ y ago)

Why? فیدهای غیر فعال status. سرورهای ما، برای یک دوره پایدار، قادر به بازیابی یک فید پادکست معتبر نبوده اند.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

An artificial intelligence program recently won a prestigious art prize and people were not happy.

AI are typically thought of as virtual assistants, like Siri and Alexa, or for doing basic admin jobs and feeding your social media algorithms.

But some are programming AI to get creative and churn out artworks – some of the results rival human art, others not so much.

Dr Sophie Calabretto talks to Cosmos Magazine journalist Evrim Yazgin about whether a machine can be an artist and the shortfalls of promising a Picasso from a program.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

97 قسمت

#Science #LiSTNR Support #Science Briefing