Jane Doe 3 And Her Motion To Remain Anonomous In The Lawsuit Against Indyke And Kahn (8/14/24)

The Epstein Chronicles

Jane Doe 3's motion to proceed anonymously in the lawsuit against Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn is a legal request filed by the plaintiff to protect her identity during the proceedings. The plaintiff argues that revealing her real name could lead to severe emotional distress, harassment, and harm to her privacy, especially given the sensitive nature of the case, which likely involves allegations related to sexual abuse or misconduct.The motion typically includes several key points:

1. Privacy and Safety Concerns: Jane Doe 3 might express fears about retaliation or further victimization if her identity is disclosed publicly.
2. Precedent: The motion may reference similar cases where courts have allowed plaintiffs to proceed anonymously to protect their identities in sensitive matters.
3. Minimal Prejudice to Defendants: The motion likely argues that allowing Jane Doe 3 to proceed anonymously does not unfairly prejudice the defendants, as they can still mount a defense without knowing her real name.
4. Balancing Public Interest and Privacy: The motion may address the balance between the public's right to know and the plaintiff's right to privacy, arguing that the public interest in the case can still be served without revealing her identity.
5. Legal Grounds: The motion is usually grounded in legal precedents and rules that permit anonymity in cases involving sensitive personal matters.

(commercial at 7:27)
to contact me:
[e-mail]
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.