با برنامه Player FM !
Of Pollsters and Shysters, But I Repeat Myself
بایگانی مجموعه ها ("فیدهای غیر فعال" status)
When? This feed was archived on February 13, 2025 22:09 (). Last successful fetch was on October 25, 2024 22:36 ()
Why? فیدهای غیر فعال status. سرورهای ما، برای یک دوره پایدار، قادر به بازیابی یک فید پادکست معتبر نبوده اند.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 367201730 series 3012803
VISIT HTTP://PETERNAVARRO.SUBSTACK.COM FOR THE REST OF THE STORY
Beware of pollsters bearing pro-Biden or pro-DeSantis gifts. I base this conclusion on two recent polling events that (once again) reveal a deeply biased and partisan pollster swamp. for example, the post-mortems of the polling results for the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections conducted by Fordham University political scientist Costas Panagopoulos. In each November election, the IBD/TIPP Tracking poll got the results exactly right. Good for it!
Yet, the vast majority of the remaining pollsters showed varying degrees of Democrat bias – 10 of the 14 featured in 2016 by Panagopoulos skewed Left and that number was 11 of 14 in 2020. Would you be surprised to learn the worst offender in 2020 was Quinnipiac while Fox News finished in the middle of the Democrat bias pack in both cycles.
Here’s the obvious takeaway: Today’s polling industry simply cannot be trusted to deliver an accurate and unbiased result.
Here’s a more subtle takeaway: LISTEN TO THE PODCAST FOR THIS
140 قسمت
بایگانی مجموعه ها ("فیدهای غیر فعال" status)
When? This feed was archived on February 13, 2025 22:09 (). Last successful fetch was on October 25, 2024 22:36 ()
Why? فیدهای غیر فعال status. سرورهای ما، برای یک دوره پایدار، قادر به بازیابی یک فید پادکست معتبر نبوده اند.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 367201730 series 3012803
VISIT HTTP://PETERNAVARRO.SUBSTACK.COM FOR THE REST OF THE STORY
Beware of pollsters bearing pro-Biden or pro-DeSantis gifts. I base this conclusion on two recent polling events that (once again) reveal a deeply biased and partisan pollster swamp. for example, the post-mortems of the polling results for the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections conducted by Fordham University political scientist Costas Panagopoulos. In each November election, the IBD/TIPP Tracking poll got the results exactly right. Good for it!
Yet, the vast majority of the remaining pollsters showed varying degrees of Democrat bias – 10 of the 14 featured in 2016 by Panagopoulos skewed Left and that number was 11 of 14 in 2020. Would you be surprised to learn the worst offender in 2020 was Quinnipiac while Fox News finished in the middle of the Democrat bias pack in both cycles.
Here’s the obvious takeaway: Today’s polling industry simply cannot be trusted to deliver an accurate and unbiased result.
Here’s a more subtle takeaway: LISTEN TO THE PODCAST FOR THIS
140 قسمت
ทุกตอน
×به Player FM خوش آمدید!
Player FM در سراسر وب را برای یافتن پادکست های با کیفیت اسکن می کند تا همین الان لذت ببرید. این بهترین برنامه ی پادکست است که در اندروید، آیفون و وب کار می کند. ثبت نام کنید تا اشتراک های شما در بین دستگاه های مختلف همگام سازی شود.