Episode 20: Recensio Aequalium

Nullius in Verba

محتوای ارائه شده توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

2y ago 1:12:06

MP3•خانه قسمت

In today’s episode, we discuss the peer review process---its history, its present, and its future. How does peer review work? How long has it existed in its current form? Should reviews be open and signed? Should reviewers be paid for their hard labor? Should we just abandon the peer review process, or does it have a positive role to play?

Shownotes

Peer Community in Registered Reports: https://rr.peercommunityin.org/

Suggestion to Darwin to publish a book about pigeons instead of The Origins of Species: https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2457A.xml

Baldwin, M. (2018). Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States. Isis, 109(3), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1086/700070

Burnham, J. C. (1990). The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA, 263(10), 1323–1329.

90 قسمت

#Science #Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens #Daniël Lakens #Smriti Mehta