Artwork

محتوای ارائه شده توسط Mentallyunscripted. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Mentallyunscripted یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal
Player FM - برنامه پادکست
با برنامه Player FM !

Ep41 – So What? The Tyranny of Merit and Everyone Gets a Participation Trophy

1:07:44
 
اشتراک گذاری
 

Manage episode 305738424 series 2854361
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Mentallyunscripted. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Mentallyunscripted یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

Is a system based on individual ability or achievement ruining society by creating a feeling of hubris in society's winners and resentment in its losers? In Mentally Unscripted episode 41, Paul and Scott review The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good? by Michael J. Sandel. In that book, the author claims that a merit-based system is destroying the common good.

Resources

* The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good?

* Meritocracy: A system in which advancement is based on individual ability or achievement.

* Does America Hate the "Poorly Educated"? by Matt Taibi

Mental Models

* Confirmation bias

* Disconfirming evidence

* Error of induction

* Inversion

* False dichotomy

Top Takeaways

* According to the author, western society is struggling because our culture of meritocracy is destroying the common good. Those who succeed have a sense of hubris and look down on those who are less successful, and the less successful resent those who succeed. Resentment against the elites is causing a rise in populism.

* On the other hand, aristocracies are less prone to hubris and resentment because people understand that their success is attributable to luck.

* The common good requires society to balance justice, goodness, and progress.

* The author's argument is weak because he doesn't take disconfirming evidence into account in his analysis, and he focuses almost exclusively on language from politicians to prove his point.

Engage with Scott and Paul on the Twitter thought control machine.

We’re also on Odysee (full episodes and clips).

Follow Scott at Strength and Reason.


This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mentallyunscripted.com
  continue reading

59 قسمت

Artwork
iconاشتراک گذاری
 
Manage episode 305738424 series 2854361
محتوای ارائه شده توسط Mentallyunscripted. تمام محتوای پادکست شامل قسمت‌ها، گرافیک‌ها و توضیحات پادکست مستقیماً توسط Mentallyunscripted یا شریک پلتفرم پادکست آن‌ها آپلود و ارائه می‌شوند. اگر فکر می‌کنید شخصی بدون اجازه شما از اثر دارای حق نسخه‌برداری شما استفاده می‌کند، می‌توانید روندی که در اینجا شرح داده شده است را دنبال کنید.https://fa.player.fm/legal

Is a system based on individual ability or achievement ruining society by creating a feeling of hubris in society's winners and resentment in its losers? In Mentally Unscripted episode 41, Paul and Scott review The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good? by Michael J. Sandel. In that book, the author claims that a merit-based system is destroying the common good.

Resources

* The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good?

* Meritocracy: A system in which advancement is based on individual ability or achievement.

* Does America Hate the "Poorly Educated"? by Matt Taibi

Mental Models

* Confirmation bias

* Disconfirming evidence

* Error of induction

* Inversion

* False dichotomy

Top Takeaways

* According to the author, western society is struggling because our culture of meritocracy is destroying the common good. Those who succeed have a sense of hubris and look down on those who are less successful, and the less successful resent those who succeed. Resentment against the elites is causing a rise in populism.

* On the other hand, aristocracies are less prone to hubris and resentment because people understand that their success is attributable to luck.

* The common good requires society to balance justice, goodness, and progress.

* The author's argument is weak because he doesn't take disconfirming evidence into account in his analysis, and he focuses almost exclusively on language from politicians to prove his point.

Engage with Scott and Paul on the Twitter thought control machine.

We’re also on Odysee (full episodes and clips).

Follow Scott at Strength and Reason.


This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mentallyunscripted.com
  continue reading

59 قسمت

Усі епізоди

×
 
Loading …

به Player FM خوش آمدید!

Player FM در سراسر وب را برای یافتن پادکست های با کیفیت اسکن می کند تا همین الان لذت ببرید. این بهترین برنامه ی پادکست است که در اندروید، آیفون و وب کار می کند. ثبت نام کنید تا اشتراک های شما در بین دستگاه های مختلف همگام سازی شود.

 

راهنمای مرجع سریع