بهترین پادکست های Nulli (2024)

1
Episode 31: Criticismus 1:15:58

14d ago1:15:58

1:15:58

In this episode, we discuss the role of criticism in science. When is criticism constructive as opposed to obsessive? What are the features of fair and useful scientific criticism? And should we explicitly teach junior researchers to both give and accept criticism? Shownotes: Babbage, C. (1830). Reflections on the Decline of Science in England: And…

1
Episode 30: Theoria Aedificans - Pars II 56:27

28d ago56:27

56:27

In this episode, we continue discussing Dubin’s 8-step method for theory building. We discuss the measurement of theoretical constructs, using logical propositions to make falsifiable predictions from theories, and the importance of specifying boundary conditions. Shownotes Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2010). Theory Construction and Model-building Sk…

1
Episode 29: Theoria Aedificans - Pars I 52:26

1M ago52:26

52:26

In this episode we discussed the 8-step method of theory building proposed by Robin Dubin in his classic 1969 book Theory Building. Shownotes Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. Free Press. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/160506.html Lynham, S. A. (2002). Quantitative Research and Theory Building: Dubin’s Method. Advances in Developin…

1
Episode 28: Scientia Cumulativa 1:12:04

2M ago1:12:04

1:12:04

In this episode, we discuss the barriers to cumulative science, including inconsistent measurement tools, overreliance on single studies, and the large volume of research publications. Can replications, interdisciplinary collaborations, and prospective meta-analyses help us solve this issue? Can AI solve all our problems? And do most scientists tre…

1
Prologus 28: Chaos in the Brickyard (B. K. Forscher) 5:40

2M ago5:40

5:40

A reading of:Forscher, B. K. (1963). Chaos in the Brickyard. Science, 142(3590), 339–339. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.142.3590.339توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 27: Vocans Ictus Tuos - Pars II 59:29

2M ago59:29

59:29

In today’s episode, we continue our conversation about preregistration. How flexible can we be when we preregister, without increasing flexibility in our analysis? How well do people preregister, and what does a good preregistration look like? And how do we deal with deviations from preregistrations? Shownotes Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. Fre…

1
Episode 26: Vocans Ictus Tuos - Pars I 1:01:34

3M ago1:01:34

1:01:34

In this two part episode we discuss the fine art of preregistration. We go back into the history of preregistration, its evolution, and current use. Do we preregister to control the Type 1 error rate, or to show that we derived our prediction from theory a priori? Can and should we preregister exploratory or secondary data analysis? And how severe …

1
Episode 25: Reverentia Ad Auctoritatem 51:23

3M ago51:23

51:23

In the first episode of 2024, we discuss the double-edged sword: reverence to authority. Should scientists respect others on whose shoulders they stand? Or should they be wary of appeal to authority? How should scientists deal with other sources of authority in science, like for example, the government or academic societies? And how can we differen…

1
Prologus 25: The Fixation of Belief (C. S. Peirce) 32:52

3M ago32:52

32:52

The Fixation of Belief. Charles S. Peirce. Popular Science Monthly 12 (November 1877), 1-15. http://peirce.org/writings/p107.htmlتوسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 24: Contra Creativitatem Epistolae - Pars II 42:20

4M ago42:20

42:20

In this second installment of The Anticreativity Letters, we continue discussing the Tempter's tactics for stifling creativity and how to overcome them.توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 23: Contra Creativitatem Epistolae - Pars I 48:07

4M ago48:07

48:07

In the first of a two-part episode, we discuss The Anticreativity Letters by Richard Nisbett, in which a senior "tempter" advises a junior tempter on ways to prevent a young psychologist from being a productive and creative scientist. Nisbett, R. E. (1990). The anticreativity letters: Advice from a senior tempter to a junior tempter. American Psych…

1
Prologus 23: The Anticreativity Letters (R. E. Nisbett) 35:55

4M ago35:55

35:55

A reading of: Nisbett, R. E. (1990). The anticreativity letters: Advice from a senior tempter to a junior tempter. American Psychologist, 45(9), 1078–1082. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.9.1078توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 22: Magisterium 57:28

5M ago57:28

57:28

In today’s episode, we discuss the role of mentorship in academia. What are the characteristics of a good mentor-mentee relationship? What are the qualities of good mentors and good mentees? Does mentorship play a role in the development of scientific knowledge? And could mentors and mentees benefit from couples therapy? Note: D.I.H.C is pronounced…

1
Episode 21: Verifica Sed Confide 55:08

5M ago55:08

55:08

In this episode, we discuss the role of trust in science. Why should we verify but trust other scientists? What are the prerequisites for building trust within the scientific community? Who is ultimately responsible for verifying our claims and practices that bolster those claims? And should we give personality tests to everyone who enters academia…

1
Prologus 21: Role of Trust in Knowledge (J. Hardwig) 46:57

5M ago46:57

46:57

In advance of our episode Verify but Trust, a reading of John Hardwig's paper The Role of Trust in Science. Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(12), 693–708.توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 20: Recensio Aequalium 1:12:06

6M ago1:12:06

1:12:06

In today’s episode, we discuss the peer review process---its history, its present, and its future. How does peer review work? How long has it existed in its current form? Should reviews be open and signed? Should reviewers be paid for their hard labor? Should we just abandon the peer review process, or does it have a positive role to play? Shownote…

1
Episode 19: Quantifauxcation 1:18:33

6M ago1:18:33

1:18:33

In this episode, we discuss Quantifauxcation, described by statistician Philip Stark as “situations in which a number is, in effect, made up, and then is given credence merely because it is quantitative.” We give examples of quantifauxcation in psychology, including errors of the third kind. We spend the second half of the podcast discussing how to…

1
Prologus 19: Problem-Centering vs. Mean-Centering in Science (A. H. Maslow) 25:23

6M ago25:23

25:23

توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 18: Vitia Vocationalis 1:15:02

7M ago1:15:02

1:15:02

In today’s episode, we discuss intellectual vices. How can we tell the difference between justified confidence and unjustified arrogance? How do we deal with feelings of envy or negative comparison with other scientists? What is the difference between building one’s career and careerism? And what do we do about scientists who do not care about the …

1
Episode 17: Snobismus 1:19:51

7M ago1:19:51

1:19:51

In this episode, we discuss scientific snobbery and the ways in which it affects our interactions with and perceptions of other scientists. What are the reasons for hierarchies among different disciplines, institutions, and approaches to science? What are some ways in which snobbery manifests in science? And is it snobby to not want to present scie…

1
Episode 16: Vetus Crisi Replicatio 42:32

7M ago42:32

42:32

In this episode, we continue our conversation on the replication crisis⏤Which methodological, theoretical, and practical concerns did psychologists raise half a century ago? What has changed, and what remains the same, during the current crisis? Shownotes Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular …

1
Prologus 16: Investigator Data Analysis Effect (T. X. Barber) 50:55

8M ago50:55

50:55

Reading of the chapter "Investigator Data Analysis Effect" from the book: Barber, T. X. (1976). Pitfalls in Human Research: Ten Pivotal Points. Pergamon Press.توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 15: Novum Crisi Replicati 55:42

8M ago55:42

55:42

In this episode, we discuss the replication crisis in psychology which has been an important topic of discussion for the last decade. We revisit some key events from the start of the replication crisis, such as the publication of Daryl Bem's studies on precognition, the paper False Positive Psychology, and the Reproducibility Project and share pers…

1
Episode 14: Capax Mentis 1:04:34

8M ago1:04:34

1:04:34

In this episode we reflect on the role of intelligence in scientist. How much does intelligence matter in science, and which other characteristics might play a role in doing good science? Do scientist need to be extremely intelligent or can anyone do science? And what is the role of stupidity in science? Capax Mentis roughly translates to "capacity…

1
Prologus 14: How can I tell if I am cut out to be a scientific research worker? (P. B. Medawar) 15:28

9M ago15:28

15:28

As prologue to the next episode on how smart one needs to be to be a scientist, we present a reading of chapter 2 "How can I tell if I am cut out to be a scientific research worker?" by Peter B. Medawar from his 1979 book 'Advice to a young scientist'. Our next episode was inspired by the section "Am I brainy enough to be a scientist?" https://www.…

1
Episode 13: Chmess 1:04:51

9M ago1:04:51

1:04:51

In this episode we discuss Daniel Dennett's distinction between chess, or research worth doing, and 'chmess,' research not worth doing. We discuss ways to determine whether our research is chess or chmess, and how to avoid being sucked into lines of research we don't particularly care about. Shownotes Dennett, D. C. (2006). Higher-order truths abou…

1
Prologus 13: Chmess (D. C. Dennett) 13:55

9M ago13:55

13:55

As prologue to the next episode on Chmess, we present a reading of a paper by Daniel C. Dennett: Dennett, D. C. (2006). Higher-order truths about chmess. Topoi, 25, 39–41.توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 12: Virtutes Vocationalis 1:26:43

9M ago1:26:43

1:26:43

In today's episode, we discuss vocational virtues⸺scientific principles that should guide the behavior of scientists. We discuss whether we agree with values put forth by numerous scientists, including Ivan Pavlov, Peter Medawar, Santiago Ramón y Cajal, Barry Schwartz, among others, and share our own. Correction: At 56:24, Smriti mentions the book …

1
Prologus 12: Science, Scholarship, and Intellectual Virtues (B.J. Schwartz) 34:17

10M ago34:17

34:17

As prologue to the next episode on vocational virtues, we present a reading of a paper by Barry Schwartz: Schwartz, B. (2022). Science, scholarship, and intellectual virtues: A guide to what higher education should be like. Journal of Moral Education, 51(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1772211 (Published online: 19 Jun 2020) You ca…

1
Episode 11: Inquisitionis Vastum 1:10:29

10M ago1:10:29

1:10:29

In this episode, we discuss the topic of research waste. We discuss what it is it that is being wasted and whether we waste fewer scientific resources and talent through coordination, team science, and better planning. Shownotes Bacon, New Atlantis, 1626: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2434/2434-h/2434-h.htm Dennett, D. C. (2006). Higher-order tru…

1
Prologus 11: The Efficiency of Scientific Research (J.D. Bernal) 1:34:14

10M ago1:34:14

1:34:14

In this bonus episode, Daniël reads Chapter 5 of John Desmond Bernal’s book The Social Function of Science, entitled The Efficiency of Scientific Research in preparation of our upcoming podcast episode on research waste. You can read The Social Function of Science by Bernal at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.1880…

1
Episode 10: Probatio Significativitatis Hypothesis Nihili 1:23:06

10M ago1:23:06

1:23:06

Shownotes Wilson, E. B. (1923). The Statistical Significance of Experimental Data. Science, 58(1493), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.58.1493.93 van Dongen, N. N. N., & van Grootel, L. (2021). Overview on the Null Hypothesis Significance Test. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hwk4n Stark, P. B., & Saltelli, A. (2018). Cargo‐cult statistics a…

1
Episode 9: Praeiudicium Publicandi 1:07:02

11M ago1:07:02

1:07:02

In this episode, we discuss the issue of publication bias. We discuss issues like: Do we learn anything from null results, given the current state of research practices? Is poorly done research still worth sharing with the scientific community? And how can we move toward a system where null results are informative and worth publishing? Shownotes Bo…

1
Episode 8: Scientia Cultus Sarcinarum 1:03:05

11M ago1:03:05

1:03:05

In this episode, we discuss physicist Richard Feynman’s famous speech ‘Cargo Cult Science,’ which refers to work that has all the affectations of science without the actual application of the scientific method. We also discuss topics like: What is pathological science? How might cargo cult science and pathological be different from pseudo-science? …

1
Prologus 8: Cargo Cult Science (R.P. Feynman) 22:34

11M ago22:34

22:34

In this bonus episode, we present a reading of the famous speech by physicist Richard Feynman on "science that isn't science," Cargo Cult Science, which will be the topic of the next episode. Enjoy.توسط Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens

1
Episode 7: Corpora Regulatoria 58:24

12M ago58:24

58:24

In this episode we discuss regulatory bodies their influence on the generation and dissemination of knowledge. Should regulatory bodies have the authority to affect the topics and methods of science? Is more highly regulated research actually better? And should we just give up on our own lines of research and become potato researchers? Shownotes Ki…

1
Episode 6: Consentio 52:19

12M ago52:19

52:19

In this episode, we discuss the importance of consensus in science, both as means of establishing true knowledge and for determining which research questions might be worth pursuing. We also discuss barriers to reaching consensus and the different frameworks that are currently employed for trying to reach consensus among important stakeholders. Sho…

1
Episode 5: Insanabile Scribendi Cacoethes 1:02:39

1y ago1:02:39

1:02:39

In this episode, we discuss the insatiable itch to publish, starting with a quote from 1927 by sociologist Clarence Case on the dictum “Publish or perish.” We discuss ways in which individual goals to publish conflict with the broader scientific goal of producing useful knowledge. We also question the assumptions behind the notion that publishing l…

1
Episode 4: Eminentia 58:51

1y ago58:51

58:51

In this episode, we discuss the role of eminence in science. What ask questions like: What makes scientists eminent? What role does eminence play in science? Can eminence be spread across scientific teams instead of individuals? And how can we recognize and applaud scientists for their contributions, while avoiding conferring too many benefits on s…

1
Episode 3: Confirmatio Praeiudicia 1:01:42

1y ago1:01:42

1:01:42

In our third episode, we discuss confirmation bias, which affects not only how scientists generate and test their own hypotheses, but also how they evaluate the scientific evidence presented by others. We discuss guardrails against confirmation bias that are already in place, and others that could potentially improve scientific practice if adopted.…

1
Episode 2: Scepticismus 1:05:37

1y ago1:05:37

1:05:37

In our second episode, we discuss the role of skepticism in science, a topic that relates closely to the title of our podcast. Given that the scientific enterprise is essentially an exercise in organized skepticism, how can we maintain a healthy amount of skepticism while also ensuring that scientists don't slip into cynicism or nihilism? Shownotes…

1
Episode 1: Motivus 55:45

1y ago55:45

55:45

In our first episode, we discuss a quote from the preface to The Instauratio Magna (of which Novum Organum is a part), in which Bacon claims that scientists should be motivated to do science for the betterment of mankind, and not for personal motives like fame, fortune, or even fun. Here is the tweet (by Heidi Seibold) on academia not being aligned…

1
Episode 0: Introductio 14:42

1y ago14:42

14:42

In this introductory episode, Daniël and Smriti share which podcasts they like, why they are starting their own, and how their connection to each other is also tied to podcasting. They also talk about the theme of the podcast, which is inspired by Francis Bacon’s delineation of the scientific method 400 years ago.…

1
3 oskust, millega oled sotsiaalmeedia haldamisel edukas 43:50

1+ y ago43:50

43:50

Milliseid sotsiaalmeediaalaseid oskusi ja teadmisi ettevõtted praegu kõige rohkem vajavad? Millised on oskused, mis tõstavad tööturul sinu väärtust ja võimaldavad sul oma sissetulekut kasvatada?

1
10 suurimat viga, mida sotsiaalmeedias tehakse 30:35

1+ y ago30:35

30:35

Toome välja 10 enamlevinud viga, mida ettevõtted Facebookis ja Instagramis teevad, ja anname praktilisi soovitusi, kuidas neid vältida. Kuula 2022. aasta Sotsiaalmeedia konverentsi salvestust meie esinemisest ja saa teada, mis need põhilised vead on.

1
5 põhjust, miks sinu Facebooki reklaamid ei too tulemusi? 19:09

3y ago19:09

19:09

Miks sinu Facebooki reklaamid inimestele korda ei lähe? Miks nad ei kliki ja miks oste ei tule? Toon välja 5 põhjust koos praktiliste nõuannetega.

1
9 nõuannet Facebooki turunduses aastaks 2021 36:28

3+ y ago36:28

36:28

Me elame uues maailmas, kus kõik oma tooteid või teenuseid Facebookis müüa soovivad. Saates jagame praktilisi nõuandeid, kuidas nende tuhandete sõnumite keskel teiste hulgast välja paista ning Facebooki abil klientideni jõuda.

1
8 uudiskirjaga 23 404 eurot müüki 11:49

3+ y ago11:49

11:49

Tahad rohkem müüke teha? Ilma, et peaksid iga kliki eest maksma? Pole vaja kaugelt otsida – võta kasutusele e-maili turundus!

1
Kuidas laste kõrvalt oma äriga alustada - HOIA homespa edulugu 38:45

3+ y ago38:45

38:45

Kuidas alustada oma toote müümist sotsiaalmeedias? Saates on külas 4 lapse ema ja HOIA homespa asutaja Triinu Karolin. Tänases saates räägime, kuidas ta leidis äriidee ja millistest turunduskanalitest hakkasid esimesed müügid tulema.

1
Meie parimad harjumused, mis tõstavad 10x sinu produktiivsust ja aitavad luua paremat elu 59:09

3+ y ago59:09

59:09

Millised on parimad harjumused ja kuidas neid luua? Millist ohtu peidab endas to do list? Kuidas tegelikult enda päevas fookust hoida ning mitte lasta ärevusel endast võitu saada? Kuula saadet ja saad teada, millised harjumused on meile olnud suureks abiks nii ettevõtjana kui ka isiklikus elus.

پادکست هایی که ارزش شنیدن دارند

پادکست های Nulli

پادکست هایی که ارزش شنیدن دارند

راهنمای مرجع سریع